|
WIN PROB
50.48%
PROJ POINTS
20.60
|
|
| EPA Margin | 0.097 | 41 |
| Off | 0.052 | 43 |
| Def | -0.045 | 40 |
| Off Success Rte | 41.2% | 64 |
| Rush | 43.4% | 45 |
| Dropback | 38.7% | 80 |
| Def Success Rte | 38.6% | 56 |
| Rush | 45.5% | 116 |
| DROPBACK | 33.4% | 4 |
| Net Points/Drive | 1.15 | 29 |
| OFF | 2.418 | 45 |
| DEF | 1.273 | 34 |
| Net Field Pos | 7.659 | 3 |
| Eckel Ratio | 63.8% | 18 |
Rutgers Off vs Nebraska Def
| 0.042 | 38 | EPA/RUSH | 19 | -0.091 |
| 0.046 | 45 | EPA/DROPBACK | 32 | -0.063 |
| 54.5% | 31 | Eckel Rate | 49 | 36.5% |
| 3.76 | 54 | Pts/Eckel | 10 | 2.20 |
| 31.1 | 9 | Field Position | 65 | 27.3 |
| 3.3% | 88 | RROE | 38 | -0.9% |
| 0.107 | 40 | Early Downs EPA | 18 | -0.143 |
| 39.1% | 75 | 3rd/4th down Success | 51 | 36.5% |
Rutgers Def vs Nebraska Off
| 0.039 | 93 | EPA/RUSH | 58 | 0.026 |
| -0.097 | 14 | EPA/DROPBACK | 48 | 0.034 |
| 30.9% | 25 | ECKEL RATE | 7 | 60.3% |
| 3.11 | 52 | PTS/ECKEL | 98 | 3.22 |
| 23.5 | 1 | FIELD POSITION | 53 | 28.6 |
| 3.2% | 87 | RROE | 57 | -1.9% |
| -0.064 | 52 | EARLY DOWNS EPA | 50 | 0.077 |
| 39.5% | 76 | 3rd/4th down Success | 49 | 43.4% |
|
WIN PROB
49.52%
PROJ POINTS
20.44
|
|
|
| 46 | 0.089 | EPA Margin |
| 58 | 0.021 | Off |
| 27 | -0.067 | Def |
| 65 | 40.9% | Off Success Rte |
| 33 | 44.5% | Rush |
| 93 | 37.4% | Dropback |
| 32 | 36.8% | Def Success Rte |
| 42 | 37.2% | Rush |
| 35 | 36.8% | DROPBACK |
| 22 | 1.33 | Net Points/Drive |
| 58 | 2.222 | OFF |
| 13 | 0.889 | DEF |
| 63 | 1.355 | Net Field Pos |
| 23 | 62.3% | Eckel Ratio |